Here Ya Go

December 27, 2008 at 6:00 pm (Feminism, Random)

I stumbled upon this blog post and I wanted to share it. I found this part really interesting:

The problem with the ‘don’t write / don’t engage’ argument is that it once again places the onus on women. ‘Avoid men who may misbehave.’ ‘Don’t write (wear) provocative stuff. ‘If you’re going to go out there, you’re asking for it.’ Sounds familiar? So it’s interesting that after years of fighting some of these ridiculous notions when it comes to rape, we’re echoing the same mistakes in a different sphere.

I find this part interesting because I’ve not only said it (don’t engage these people) before on this blog but I do it myself. This may come as a shock to you but I don’t have a lot of patience. So I reach a limit with most people rather quickly. So I’ve always thought of my not engaging as walking away from a pointless discussion—stay around stupid long enough and you’ll catch it (and believe me, I have). But the idea that it’s a type of silencing is interesting and one to think about a bit more. Of course, the blog post is more serious than that because it’s talking about cyber-stalking and death threats.

By ‘developing a thick skin’, we often subtly condone unjust or inhuman behavior.

But the pressure is on the woman to change her behavior and not for the person who is in the wrong to change his behavior. So . . .

Permalink Leave a Comment

Idiots

December 27, 2008 at 3:22 pm (Feminism, Random, Rants)

No, douchebags, there are no excuses. I’ll be the first to agree with societal influences helping to push people to do things. But as soon as you start hurting someone then it’s over. No more excuses. So all this bullshit I’m seeing about how tough this guy had it or how the divorce courts are unfair to men needs to stop. I’m seeing a little sexism when the discussion turns toward the divorce (here’s an idea! teach men to respond in a non-violent manner to life’s problems instead of assuming that the bitch did something to deserve it). Respond rationally to perceived slights–organize, protest, set up a letter writing campaign, or whatever. All that planning he did for this massacre could have been used to do something that could have changed the world for the better.

But instead, he decided to make a bunch of people pay for him not having the life he thought he deserved. Narcissism and entitlement all rolled up into one! Those two components may explain why his life wasn’t what he thought it should be—so he shot an 8 year old girl in the face. Yeah.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Holiday Cheer

December 23, 2008 at 2:45 pm (Random, Rants)

Hey, people on LiveJournal! Stop responding to lost_kite! While I doubt s/he’s a troll, there is no doubt that s/he is a long-winded, semantics debater. And even worse: s/he is proud of it.

Aw, When Fangirls Attack. I once loved you. I don’t doubt that it’s hard work doing what you do. But you’ve given up the ghost. You like the drama too much. Plus, you’ve bent over backwards to make sure that you’re “fair” and in doing so, you’ve destroyed everything that was great about you. Also, for the love of all that is holy!—put names next to the links. I need to know which links to avoid.

Speaking of links from When Fangirls Attack . . . taking the time to “debate” someone who treats you like his little sister isn’t brave. When someone comes into a debate thinking that you are less than they are—when a double standard of behavior exists in a debate, you are not being brave by keeping it up. You are being foolish. And listen to this next part carefully because it’s important: just because the person you’re “debating” says that s/he’s a feminist/not racist/a really swell guy, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s true. In fact, you can probably tell that someone isn’t really an ally or a feminist if he lets misogynistic comments go by without speaking up against them—especially when they’re on his own blog. Just because s/he says that s/he’s debating you in good faith and s/he keeps taking the time to answer your posts—none of that means that s/he is arguing with you to really learn something from you. It just means that s/he wants the last word.

Every place on the Internet is not your place. If people are talking shit about you on a message board—especially a locked part of that message board—don’t go joining it and posting. Christ on a cracker—defending yourself to strangers on the Internet makes no sense. Thinking that you have a right to storm a forum or a blog and throw hissy fits about what other people are saying is insane. I’ve seen MRAs do this. I’ve seen creepy middle aged women do this. Not only is it stupid, it shows a massive amount of entitlement, not only to the space but to other people’s attention.

Quit getting your panties into a wad because a group of people think you need to shut-up and listen. So, white people, quit crying because you’re asked not to use certain words. Quit whining because you may have to actually shut-up, not dictate the rules of an argument/a meeting/society like you once did, and listen to someone else’s viewpoint. Same goes for every other privileged group out there. It hurts when you don’t get to make up the rules, change them in the middle, and then punish people who don’t follow your rules, doesn’t it? Must be hard to have to treat other people equally to yourself.

Logic is not the only ability humans have developed over the years. We’ve also learned compassion, empathy, and kindness. We are not robots. Constant cries for logic and lack of emotion deny a major source of our humanity. Logic is nothing without compassion to guide it.

Am I the only person to have had my self-esteemed destroyed in middle school? I must have been because a hell of a lot of people post their pictures on-line. And they shouldn’t. Sure, I feel bad for thinking that but . . . damn, people! Hide in the dark like I do! I have made the world a better place by wearing a bag over my head . . . constantly.

If someone gets angry with you, it might not be because you “hit a little too close to the truth” but because you’re being a douchebag. In fact, the second one is much more likely.

If someone doesn’t like something, it doesn’t automatically follow that they don’t understand it or that they don’t “get it.” That’s one of the most condescending things you can say to a person. Not to mention, it shows a major lack of maturity to not be able to handle the fact that people like different things than you do.

Not everything is about you. Someone could post about a general societal problem and a good number of people will take it as some sort of personal insult. The world and its problems are bigger than you.

Anger is not a bad thing. It can be used and focused to change the world. But that’s OK—keep acting like you don’t care. That’s what helps to make the world a better place—indifference. :roll:

Everything a person does that you don’t like isn’t some sort of problem on their end. Not everyone is passive-aggressive/projecting/edgy/crying out for attention. Most of the time, people are just being dicks. That doesn’t mean they have some sort of major problem that should be labeled by the American Medical Association.

And while I have a lot of crap that irritates the hell out of me, what I see around me in the real world is pissing me off more than anything else. Your first instinct is to say, “Well, sure, the real world is full of people and you hate them too. Big shock.” in a sarcastic tone but that’s not what I mean. Yeah, they irritate me but what really upsets me is that a lot of them are struggling right now. Like losing their home/no groceries this week/nothing under the Christmas tree but that’s OK because they couldn’t afford a Christmas tree either kind of struggle. All these little irritations are fun to rant about but they are nothing compared to these problems.

Photobucket

And to add even more joy to your season:

Here ya go. But that’s OK because a man told me differently because he found one statistic that said differently so his one statistic must be true while the multiple places I’ve seen this kind of report must be wrong. Uh-huh. :roll:

Here ya go. Let the excuses for her attackers begin.

So . . . not really feeling the holiday spirit right now. Even a Batman action figure as our tree topper can not bring about that warm glow.

Photobucket

Permalink Leave a Comment

December 11, 2008 at 2:37 pm (Random)

You are all bastards for letting my dragon die. But I still care enough about you to let you know that I will continue to be away for awhile.

What do you mean you don’t care?!?!

Fine. Here are pictures/videos to take up the front page so you don’t see the corpse of my dead dragon. Bastards.

more about “untitled“, posted with vodpod

Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

funny pictures of cats with captions

funny pictures of cats with captions

And if you can, spread your holiday cheer.

Permalink Leave a Comment

December 2, 2008 at 11:41 am (Random)

Adopt one today!

Why in the hell do I do these sorts of things? Why do I click on things?!?!

Anyway, I’ve been away for a bit. Plus, things are happening in RL that are keeping me from the computer so I’ll just apologize right now to everyone I’ve been ignoring. I’m trying to catch up. I haven’t forgotten you!

Or maybe I have. Who cares?! Go eat some holiday leftovers and leave me the fuck alone.

:P

Permalink Leave a Comment