My Face Is Melting
Thanks to waswisgirl1 for the link.
As written, the bill would ban women from seeking an abortion without written consent from the father of the fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women would be required to submit a list of possible fathers. The physician would be forced to conduct a paternity test from the provided list and then seek paternal permission to abort.
Yes, that’s right ladies. You would have to give a list of men that you screwed. That’s because, as we all know, only whores get abortions. Whores don’t know who they’ve slept with—that baby could be anybody’s! This isn’t legislating morality at all!
In addition, women would be required to present a police report in order to prove a pregnancy is the result of rape or incest.
Yeah, this wouldn’t be victimizing the victim all over again.
“But wait!” you scream at me. Doesn’t this bill give men a voice? Shouldn’t they be allowed a say in whether or not their baby lives or dies?
Yeah, listen here, dummy. A guy has a say. He makes his decision when he decides if he wants to have unprotected sex or not. That’s when he needs to make his decision.
“But wait!” you whine. The woman gets months to make a decision but he has to decide during the sex act? That’s not fair!
Gee, too bad. Biology did that, not me. This isn’t a surprise to anyone with a halfway functioning brain. She carries the baby so she has longer to make the decision. He doesn’t, so he decides when everything under his control—anything having to do with his body—is at play. That means he decides about a baby when he pulls his winky out, when he decides where to put his winky, and when he decides to cover his winky up or not.
I swear, it’s like I’m dealing with dumb monkeys. Like poo-flinging monkeys. Do you think women are jumping out of bushes and forcing themselves on unprotected men? Just so that they can get pregnant and then one day have an abortion? Why are men never blamed for something in which they take part? In something they willingly, knowingly take part?
Oh, I forgot. It’s the whores in the bushes.
Oh, Canada!
This is what I get for having a life. I totally missed out on this race—yes, I occasionally watch car races. This was a Busch race, not a Nextel race.
Let me explain to you why I can’t stand Robbie Gordon. He’s a big-mouth with little talent. He’s always complaining about other people while he does crappy things. It’s always someone else’s fault.
Now, ask me how much I hate Jimmie Johnson or the Busch brothers. Man, I can’t believe I actually put something on here about auto racing. My dad would be so proud!
Misogyny: The World’s Oldest Prejudice
. . . misogynistic notion which equates sexual purity in women with goodness.
Thank goodness that has changed!
Misogyny always confronts women with the same dilemma. Whether they are ‘good’ girls or ‘bad’ girls, they are forced into the same conundrum; they still arouse lust in men for which they, not those who desire them, are held responsible.
Makes totally sense. That’s why you are to blame for your rape, ladies. Shouldn’t have worn that short skirt. Tsk, tsk.
It was typical of the age-old campaign to prove that women who are smart enough to think for themselves have no morals; or if they have, will surely lose them.
The author is writing about Cleopatra here. It’s sort of interesting to look at the above statement from the view of modern propaganda against feminists. Women who think for themselves—let’s include feminists in that group—are butch lesbians. Not an exact match up with the above statement but surely a descendant of that campaign against Cleopatra.
